<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charging alumni to use athletic complex will hurt university</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/</link>
	<description>Campus, local and world news reported daily by University of St. Thomas students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:14:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luis Maya</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>Nowak has nailed it!

In my case, I am part of the UST Crew Club. Our training room used during the winter was located at O&#039;Shaughnessy Hall. With the building gone, we had to find other means to maintain in shape through the winter months; this was solved by driving 30+ minutes. How were we affected? We had to cut down our workouts to avoid traffic coming back to campus, not to mention the money spent for gas. One year of membership would be the least UST could do for us. Either way, I feel a great connection to the school and will rather pay UST membership fee than any other fitness center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowak has nailed it!</p>
<p>In my case, I am part of the UST Crew Club. Our training room used during the winter was located at O&#8217;Shaughnessy Hall. With the building gone, we had to find other means to maintain in shape through the winter months; this was solved by driving 30+ minutes. How were we affected? We had to cut down our workouts to avoid traffic coming back to campus, not to mention the money spent for gas. One year of membership would be the least UST could do for us. Either way, I feel a great connection to the school and will rather pay UST membership fee than any other fitness center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nowak</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nowak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>I think the University has a couple options. 




One could be monetarily reimbursing the student body that has had to deal with not having an athletic facility. When we pay to go to school at UST we are paying for the use of all facilities. For an entire year there are almost no athletic facilities on campus, and for a school who clearly understands the need to have facilities, they should understand that it is a large reason people attend St. Thomas, (how many people would come here if there was no athletic facilities)



Another solution could be to offer at least one year of free services for all students that were affected by the construction and inconvenience of not having athletic facilities. I think that this is the least the university could do. 




Personally the men&#039;s Volleyball team drives 15 minutes away twice a week to practice at a local high school which we were lucky enough to get very cheaply. This is an example that the cost associated with not having the athletic facilities is not just about the convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the University has a couple options. </p>
<p>One could be monetarily reimbursing the student body that has had to deal with not having an athletic facility. When we pay to go to school at UST we are paying for the use of all facilities. For an entire year there are almost no athletic facilities on campus, and for a school who clearly understands the need to have facilities, they should understand that it is a large reason people attend St. Thomas, (how many people would come here if there was no athletic facilities)</p>
<p>Another solution could be to offer at least one year of free services for all students that were affected by the construction and inconvenience of not having athletic facilities. I think that this is the least the university could do. </p>
<p>Personally the men&#8217;s Volleyball team drives 15 minutes away twice a week to practice at a local high school which we were lucky enough to get very cheaply. This is an example that the cost associated with not having the athletic facilities is not just about the convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Fettig</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Fettig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1883</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you Katie. Matt, while there may be 50,000 Tommies in the Twin Cities I doubt that they will all capitalize on the opportunity. We as seniors have been apart of this community for at least four years and to be able to continue to use facilities after graduating is a great way to stay connected. I don&#039;t think that every alum will be using the facilities, but they should be able to if they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you Katie. Matt, while there may be 50,000 Tommies in the Twin Cities I doubt that they will all capitalize on the opportunity. We as seniors have been apart of this community for at least four years and to be able to continue to use facilities after graduating is a great way to stay connected. I don&#8217;t think that every alum will be using the facilities, but they should be able to if they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Pogin</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Pogin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>Matt- it&#039;s true that money was donated specifically for the althletic/student center, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s true that the university itself didn&#039;t contribute money towards it outside of that donation. The donation was $60 million I believe, and I think the center cost at least $66 million to build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt- it&#8217;s true that money was donated specifically for the althletic/student center, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s true that the university itself didn&#8217;t contribute money towards it outside of that donation. The donation was $60 million I believe, and I think the center cost at least $66 million to build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1880</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1880</guid>
		<description>Katie, it is unfortunate that some of the information in your opinion piece is incorrent. I think that is due to the university failing to inform students properly on how these new buildings are being funded. The money for the new buildings could not go towards tuition or financial aid. The money was a gift to the university, and the people donating the money said what they wanted it to go toward. The university didn&#039;t have a choice. In fact, if they didn&#039;t start building these new buildings the donors would have pulled their funding. Again, it is too bad that St. Thomas administration couldn&#039;t clearly articulate that to the student body. They rarely articulate anything clearly to the students it seems. I also diasgree with you that alumni should be able to use the new athletic facility. It is a center for students, not former students. If they open it to alumni, is it going to be open to all alumni? How far do you go back? Is it fair to limit the number of alumni? How would you feel if next year you went to work out but all the machines were being used by a bunch of old guys? St. Thomas is a lot larger than St. John&#039;s, and we have a lot more alumni. There are 50,000 Tommies in the Twin Cities alone that would be elegible to use the building. Is that fair for current...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie, it is unfortunate that some of the information in your opinion piece is incorrent. I think that is due to the university failing to inform students properly on how these new buildings are being funded. The money for the new buildings could not go towards tuition or financial aid. The money was a gift to the university, and the people donating the money said what they wanted it to go toward. The university didn&#8217;t have a choice. In fact, if they didn&#8217;t start building these new buildings the donors would have pulled their funding. Again, it is too bad that St. Thomas administration couldn&#8217;t clearly articulate that to the student body. They rarely articulate anything clearly to the students it seems. I also diasgree with you that alumni should be able to use the new athletic facility. It is a center for students, not former students. If they open it to alumni, is it going to be open to all alumni? How far do you go back? Is it fair to limit the number of alumni? How would you feel if next year you went to work out but all the machines were being used by a bunch of old guys? St. Thomas is a lot larger than St. John&#8217;s, and we have a lot more alumni. There are 50,000 Tommies in the Twin Cities alone that would be elegible to use the building. Is that fair for current&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kolnik</title>
		<link>http://www.tommiemedia.com/opinions/charging-alumni-to-use-athletic-complex-will-hurt-university/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kolnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommiemedia.com/?p=6549#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Excellent observation!  There should be no charge to alums for any event on campus.  We should be leaders in this area not followers.  What a great way to promote Alumni-Student mentoring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent observation!  There should be no charge to alums for any event on campus.  We should be leaders in this area not followers.  What a great way to promote Alumni-Student mentoring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

